Search for: "N. A. R.C." Results 1 - 20 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2008, 11:53 pm
Bicron Corp. in 1994, it has been well established that an age claim under R.C. 4112.99 is subject to the 180-day statute of limitations in R.C. 4112.02(N). [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:24 am by MBettman
Key Statute and Precedent in this Case Current Version of R.C. 2305.131(A)(1)  (Ten Year Statute of Repose) (“[N]o cause of action to recover damages for bodily injury, an injury to real or personal property, or wrongful death that arises out of a defective and unsafe condition of an improvement to real property . . . shall accrue against a person who performed services for the improvement to real property or a person who furnished the design, planning, supervision… [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 9:51 am
" Because R.C. 4112.02(N) and 4112.99 have broad remedial language allowing for the full panoply of legally recognized relief (i.e., back pay, front pay, compensatory damages, and punitive damages), the age discrimination statute adequately protects Ohio's strong policy against age discrimination and therefore a parallel common law claim is not needed. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
This is because R.C. 5713.03 (in 2008, 2011 and currently) has its own, “built-in” [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
This is because R.C. 5713.03 (in 2008, 2011 and currently) has its own, “built-in” [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am by MBettman
Bode, 2015-Ohio-1519 (“[A]n adjudication of delinquency may not be used to enhance the penalty for a later offense under R.C. 4511.19(G)(1)(d) when the adjudication carried the possibility of confinement, the adjudication was uncounseled, and there was no effective waiver of the right to counsel. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:42 am by MBettman
Reese rebuts Carter’s argument that the Good Samaritan statute only applies to health care professionals by pointing to the plain language of the statute which states, “[n]o person shall be liable…”. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am by MBettman
Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Ohio Div. of Wildlife, 2015-Ohio-3731 (“[i]n reviewing a statute, a court cannot pick out one sentence and disassociate it from the context, but must look to the four corners of the enactment to determine the intent of the enacting body. [read post]